WIDER: On this fourth day of July in the year 2014,
these words from eight years ago seem much more fitting than the tiresome catch
phrases and cliches we hear all around:
Published on Monday, July
3, 2006 by the Progressive
Put Away the Flags
by Howard
Zinn
On this July 4, we would do well to renounce
nationalism and all its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its
anthems, its insistence in song that God must single out America to be blessed.
Is not nationalism -- that
devotion to a flag, an anthem, a boundary so fierce it engenders mass murder --
one of the great evils of our time, along with racism, along with religious
hatred?
These ways of thinking --
cultivated, nurtured, indoctrinated from childhood on -- have been useful to those
in power, and deadly for those out of power.
National spirit can be
benign in a country that is small and lacking both in military power and a
hunger for expansion (Switzerland, Norway, Costa Rica and many more). But in a
nation like ours -- huge, possessing thousands of weapons of mass destruction
-- what might have been harmless pride becomes an arrogant nationalism
dangerous to others and to ourselves.
Our citizenry has been
brought up to see our nation as different from others, an exception in the world,
uniquely moral, expanding into other lands in order to bring civilization,
liberty, democracy.
That self-deception
started early.
When the first English
settlers moved into Indian land in Massachusetts Bay and were resisted, the
violence escalated into war with the Pequot Indians. The killing of Indians was
seen as approved by God, the taking of land as commanded by the Bible. The
Puritans cited one of the Psalms, which says: "Ask of me, and I shall give
thee, the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the Earth
for thy possession."
When the English set fire
to a Pequot village and massacred men, women and children, the Puritan
theologian Cotton Mather said: "It was supposed that no less than 600
Pequot souls were brought down to hell that day."
On the eve of the Mexican
War, an American journalist declared it our "Manifest Destiny to
overspread the continent allotted by Providence." After the invasion of
Mexico began, The New York Herald announced: "We believe it is a part of
our destiny to civilize that beautiful country."
It was always supposedly
for benign purposes that our country went to war.
We invaded Cuba in 1898 to
liberate the Cubans, and went to war in the Philippines shortly after, as
President McKinley put it, "to civilize and Christianize" the
Filipino people.
As our armies were
committing massacres in the Philippines (at least 600,000 Filipinos died in a
few years of conflict), Elihu Root, our secretary of war, was saying: "The
American soldier is different from all other soldiers of all other countries
since the war began. He is the advance guard of liberty and justice, of law and
order, and of peace and happiness."
We see in Iraq that our
soldiers are not different. They have, perhaps against their better nature,
killed thousands of Iraq civilians. And some soldiers have shown themselves
capable of brutality, of torture.
Yet they are victims, too,
of our government's lies.
How many times have we
heard President Bush and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld tell the troops
that if they die, if they return without arms or legs, or blinded, it is for
"liberty," for "democracy"?
One of the effects of
nationalist thinking is a loss of a sense of proportion. The killing of 2,300
people at Pearl Harbor becomes the justification for killing 240,000 in
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The killing of 3,000 people on Sept. 11 becomes the
justification for killing tens of thousands of people in Afghanistan and Iraq.
And nationalism is given a
special virulence when it is said to be blessed by Providence. Today we have a
president, invading two countries in four years, who announced on the campaign
trail last year that God speaks through him.
We need to refute the idea
that our nation is different from, morally superior to, the other imperial powers
of world history.
We need to
assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation.
2 comments:
Hear, hear!
I think that people who are ferociously assertive of the supreme wonderfulness of their country (or state, or city, or NFL team, etc.) harbor some deep inner intuition that it just ain't so. Doubt compensates itself through showy displays. Confidence, on the other hand, is usually a quiet -- and tolerant -- thing.
I heartily agree, Jim, as I'm sure you know.
Post a Comment